Last week I went to several exhibitions during the same day that all had strong connections to Gerhard Richter. As I happen to share the opinion of many people that Richter is probably the greatest living painter and admire his work, it was a very pleasant discovery indeed.In the
National Portrait Gallery there is the
Gerhard Richter Portraits exhibition on.
It's an absolutely brilliant display of his wonderfully varied work and different styles, yet it is held together as a coherent show by the theme of portraiture. His oeuvre is huge as he has always experimented and tried different approaches to painting. Although that means it's sometimes hard to know what to expect from his work, like the exhibition last winter in the Serpentine Gallery, which I wasn't too keen on. But the portraits are excellent.
What makes his work especially interesting to me is the fact that he works from photographs and newspaper clippings - very appealing to a photographer who works with newspapers. The photographic though blurry quality of the works is very enticing.
I also find his approach to portraiture really refreshing in comparison to what was taught to me at school. He has said: 'A portrait must not express anything of the sitter's 'soul', essence or character'. The reality remains hidden beneath the veneer of appearance.
My favorite painting is still Betty (1988) but it has to be seen in real life to understand it's allure.

Hurry! It's closing on the 31st of May.
In
The Photographer's Gallery there's an exhibition on the subject of The Photographic Object, which included painted photographs by Richter among works by well-known photographers and artists like W. Tillmans and A. Warhol and tackles a very interesting and exciting realm. Sadly it is generally quite underwhelming - I was expecting to be intrigued but was left rather bored and confused (especially by the Vanessa Billy piece) in the end.
I then went on to check out the newly reopened
Whitechapel Gallery, which was very impressive, a truly wonderful space!
There were many exhibitions on in the several galleries spaces there and the main show was of the work of the sculptor
Isa Genzken, Richter's second wife, paintings of whom I had seen just a few hours previously at the Portrait Gallery exhibition.
Genzken's work was exhibited over two floors and provided a great overview of the artist's work. I personally am not familiar enough with the genre of sculpture to fully appreciate and understand it, but at least I got a chace to educate myself a little on that.
In conclusion, it's evident that Richter is popping up everywhere! :D
Here's an interesting fact that only Estonian people will understand:His first wife was Marianne Eufinger (who he called Ema) and his second wife was the sculptor Isa Genzken. How weird a coincidence is that?